October 28, 2008

Specifying Healthcare Colors - what the research says

Specifying-HealthCare-Colors-Blog

Jean Young offered a concise opinion on the use of color in healthcare in an email she sent me last week:

... there is NO EVIDENCE that shows us which color makes a difference in our healing environment. Very important to note that. There is SO much misinformation out there about this.

To back up her idea she referred me an article that she wrote called A summary of Color in Healthcare Environments: A Critical Review of the Research Literature. To read the article, which was in HealthCare Design Magazine: click here.

She also questioned the use of my language in the post "Rules for picking Colors".

I would like to recommend that you possibly reconsider renaming one item that says “Rules for Picking Colors”. We do not like to refer to specifying colors as “picking”; it really is way more than that.

Jean M. Young, ASID, CID, AAHID is President and Chief Designer/Planner at Young + Co., Inc. in San Diego.

October 27, 2008

HealthCare Leadership: New Resource on Evidence-based Design

HealthCare-Leadership-Blog
HealtlhCare Leadership is a new free website to help you learn about Evidence-based Design (EBD). The URL for the website is: www.healthdesign.org/hcleader

The goal of the website is to "summarize the latest scientific research - also offer practical solutions, action steps and an ROI evaluation framework for healthcare executives who must evaluate and justify investments in new construction and renovation projects."

The site, which is oriented toward the "decision makers", offers a variety of free online tools. For example they have Five "White Papers" on key concepts. These are Acrobat PDF publications which are free for download:

  • The Business Case for Building Better Hospitals Through EBD
  • Culture Change and Facility Design: A Model for Joint Optimization 
  • Implementing Healthcare Excellence: The Vital Role of the CEO in EBD
  • Maximizing the Impact of Nursing Care Quality: A Closer Look at the Hospital Work Environment & the Nurses's Impact on Patient-Quality Care
  • A Review of the Research Literature on Evidence-Based Design

It is the last one; the review of the research literature that really caught my eye. You can download this essential 76-page document for free. This was just published in the journal HERD. If you are serious about understanding EBD and Evidence-based Art, this is required reading.

The HealthCare Leadership website is a collaboration of the Center for Health Design and Georgia Tech. It is funded from a grant by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

October 22, 2008

Religious Art Offers Pain Relief to Believers

Pain-and-Religion-BlogOf these two pictures by Leonardo da Vinci only the Virgin Mary reduced pain.

New research suggests that when believers view religious art they experience less pain.

Practicing Catholics perceived electrical shocks while viewing an image of the Virgin Mary (above right) as less painful than shocks delivered while looking at a non-religious picture (above left). In contrast, professed atheists and agnostics derived no pain relief from viewing the same religious image while getting uncomfortably zapped on the hand.

The research was done by Katja Wiech of the University of Oxford in England. Bruce Bower wrote an article describing the research in the October 11th issue of Science News.

To read the full article click here

I wonder about the implications of this research on art selection in hospitals. If a patient is known to have strong religious beliefs, should an attempt be made to change the art in their surroundings to offer images which trigger religious feelings?

Thanks to Dr. Upali Nanda for pointing this out to me.

October 13, 2008

Last Day to Win a $200 Design Book

Winabookblog

Only One Day left! 
If you want to win a Free copy of this book, get your entry in before midnight CST on Wednesday October 15th.

The Challenge
Describe your most challenging healthcare art project and how you solved it.

The Prize
A signed-copy of Jain Malkin's essential new book - A Visual Reference for Evidence-Based Design. A $200 value. To read my review of the book click here.

What is needed to win
Write a paragraph or two, no more than 500 words, describing your most challenging healthcare art project and how you solved it. Email the text to me at henry@henrydomke.com

Who is eligible

Anyone on the planet involved in the use of art in healthcare.

When is the deadline
All entries must be received by Wednesday October 15th, 2008.

Who is judging the contest?

Me (Henry Domke)

Note: it helps if you have a snapshot showing the installation, but that is not required.

The winners will be featured on this website: www.HealthCareFineArt.com

October 05, 2008

Ripple - New Online Source for Evidence-based Design

Rippleblog

While reading the September issue of HealthCare Design Magazine, I learned about a new source of information on Evidence-based Design: RIPPLE.  Debra Levin called it

...an open-source, searchable database to help you begin to sort through all of the design recommendations and related research out there.

Though it is in its infancy, you can use it to gather information for decisions, as well as add to its vitality by adding information and joining in on conversations that will soon be available.

When I tested out the website I was disappointed that a simple search for the word "Art" came up with no results. However, the website is just getting started; they are calling it a "beta".

To check out RIPPLE, the website is www.ripple.healthdesign.org

There are other online design databases:

October 02, 2008

Evidence-Based Design: Pros and Cons

Foresttrail_blog

Forest-Trail_4698

Dr. Anjali Joseph recently wrote a helpful post on the Center for Health Design's Blog. She explores some of the current controversies around Evidence-based Design (EBD). Since many experts feel that EBD should be applied to the use of Art in Healthcare, I thought it would be useful to try to summarize the ideas:

Con: EBD is old hat
Pro: EBD formalizes that old hat

Con: EBD is cook-book design
Pro: EBD is only one part of the process

Con: EBD is the mindless application of research
Pro: EBD looks to see if existing research applies to your project

Con: High-quality research does not exist to answer most design questions
Pro: It is true that EBD is in it’s infancy, but that does not mean it is wrong

Con: It is hard to find what research has been done
Pro: Use a Resource librarian

To read Dr. Joseph's post click here

September 23, 2008

Research Projects for non-Scientists

Researchprojectsblog

There is a tremendous interest in Evidence-based Design these days. I have had several people suggest to me that I conduct some research studying the impact of my art on patients. If I wanted to do do research, what would be involved regarding time, people and money? When I say research here I mean real research; high-value research that will stand up over time. I would want it to be research worthy of being  published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.

To help begin to explore what needs to be considered for a research project I asked someone who does this for a living, Dr. Debra Harris. Debra is an Evidence-based Researcher for RAD Consulting. The following is an interview conducted by email:

Let's say I want to study the impact of black-and-white vs. color nature photographs in ICU patients diagnosed with a heart attack. I want to see if it alters their heart rate, blood pressure, duration in the ICU and amount of pain medication requested. I was thinking there could be three groups. One group with no art. The second group with a 30 x 40-inch color landscape and the third group with a 30 x 40-inch black-and white landscape.

First, is that a reasonable way to propose a research topic? Or should it be refined?

Yes, this is an excellent proposed study. Your research question is… Does natural photographic artwork influence the physical responses of ICU patients who have suffered a heart attack?

The dependent variables are heart rate, blood pressure, amount of pain medication used (not requested) and average length of stay. These data points are easy to collect from the patient chart. Statistical analysis will show if art is having a significant impact on the patient’s condition based on your four data sets.

What would I want to budget for a project like this if I wanted to make sure it was done properly?

This is always a loaded question. If you are hiring a research firm to conduct the study, then the cost is the expense of the research team, time and materials (equipment, expenses). If using an academic research team, the costs include the time of the research team (lead investigator, graduate students), tuition, indirect cost to the university which is an additional 25% - 53%, equipment, travel and other expenses.

If I were to guess and make certain assumptions like you were providing the artwork ready to install at no cost to the study, data collection took maximum 4 months and that the hospital was local to the research team, minimizing travel expenses, I would guess that this study could be conducted for about $40,000.

Interested in finding funding? It sounds like an interesting study!

How long would a project like this typically take from inception to publication?

The time to complete a project like this from research design to final research report would take from 8 months to a year. This would include research design, receiving approval from the IRB, collecting data, analyzing data and assimilating it into a meaningful report. This does not include publication. That is a different animal. A study of this nature could be completed in one year at an academic institution, but may require less time if a professional research firm was conducting the study. 

In order to get good evidence, how many patients would need to be studied? Should it include men and women?

Gender is a variable that should be determined while defining the research design. There may be reasons for limiting the study to one gender or the other, but for this study, I would include both men and women that suffered a recent heart attack and is recovering in the ICU.

Determining sample size requires a statistical power analysis. One cannot guess at the sample size. In order to determine sample size, one must know how big the difference needs to be to be meaningful for each variable, the confidence level (.95 is typical for peer review), the variability, and the effect size. Once you have that information, you can run the equation to determine sample size; then you need to add a percentage to account for invalid responses.

Since I am not affiliated with a University and since I have no idea how to do research properly, who do I need to hire? Where do I find them?

You could contact a university that has researchers interested in your topic which may lead to an academic research study utilizing available resources. As mentioned before, it may add time to the study plan. Another choice is to hire a professional research consulting firm like RAD Consultants that can allocate time and resources.

Are there any common road blocks I should anticipate? Are hospital ethics committees likely to veto the project?

Ethics committees at hospitals are called the Institutional Review Board (IRB). The study will have to go through an approval process with the IRB in order to collect data on your patient population.

Most medical IRBs require that the principal investigator complete an ethics course and test for certification.

The IRB process can take as little as three weeks or take months, depending on the data to be collected and the board’s satisfaction that all measures are taken to protect the health and privacy of subjects.

I do not think that an IRB board would veto this project as long is the risk to patients is very low and the research design has enough power to test the hypothesis.

Once the research is done, how does one go about submitting it for publication?

Publication to a peer review journal takes a significant amount of time. First, you have to write the article based on the methodology and the findings in a way that meets the criteria of the journal. Then, the article is submitted and may be rejected, accepted with provisional revisions or accepted with minimal changes. Once accepted, the article will be placed at the publisher’s discretion in the cue for publication. The process may take several months to a year or longer.

There was a previous post about Debra's work at RAD consulting on this blog. To see the article click here. 

Debra Harris, Ph.D., AAHID

Continue reading "Research Projects for non-Scientists" »

September 17, 2008

ICU Art so bad I wanted to cover it with a towel

Vaughnicublog

Click Image to see a larger view of what Vaughn saw from his bed in the ICU

My good friend and fellow photographer Vaughn Wascovich was hospitalized this week. I wanted to get his perspective on what the art experience was like as he lay there in his ICU bed for two days. He was in a brand new ICU room in a hospital close to Dallas.

What art did you see, what was it like?

I was really disturbed by the art. There was only one black-and-white print, a studio shot of a flower. Where I lay in bed I had no choice but to look at it. It was so bad I wanted to cover it with a towel.

Why did it bother you so much?

The flower was obviously a studio shot with a white background. It seemed anemic; like me. It seemed disconnected and since I felt disconnected, that was bad.  I care about home and place and this picture did not put me there, it bothered me.

You mentioned that it was black-and-white, do you think that made it worse for you?

I can't say, normally I love black-and-white photography. But in this setting it seemed dated, disconnected and not organic. Nothing around me was organic, even my limited view out the window was a parking lot.

When I was in bed I had very few options about what to look at; it's the clock, the TV or the art. The TV just made me feel worse. All the ads seemed to be about food. Since I couldn't eat that was very stress inducing. A Wendy's hamburger never looked so good...

I should have brought my iPod, that would have helped a lot, I could have closed my eyes and listened to music.

What art would you have liked?

Well, I'm drawn to landscapes, but not one by that Painter-of-Light guy, what's his name... (Thomas Kinkade). His pictures show beauty as a fantasy, they are not real. I wanted to be connected to the real world.

What was it like when you got out?

I went to a local garden and that helped tremendously. I touched and smelled the plants. It really felt good.

Vaughn Wascovich teaches photography at Texas A&M. You can see his work at: www.wascovich.com Below is a close up of the picture that was on his wall:

Badicuartblog

Continue reading "ICU Art so bad I wanted to cover it with a towel" »

September 04, 2008

Evidence-based Design Under Attack (Part 2)

Ebdvsrbd2

Last week we had a post about an article in World Health Design that took a critical look at Evidence-based Design. I had been unable to reach the author,  Dr. Jacqueline Vischer before putting up that post. Now she has responded to a series of questions.

Note: in this interview, EBD: Evidence-based Design while RBD: Research-based Design and POE refers to Post Occupancy Evaluation

I'm not really clear on how EDB and RBD design are different. They are both involved with using scientific method's  to test  a hypothesis about a design process that might measurably improve patient outcome aren't they? How do hey differ? Cyndi McCullough wrote that "EDB is rooted more in healthcare provider observation and anecdotal evidence", while " RBD is more rigorous and is based on studies using comparative research instruments..." Why is that true?

I do not distinguish between Research-Based design and Evidence-Based design, it seems to me that the terms could be interchangeable. EBD is gaining currency as a defined and specific approach whereby social science measurement tools are applied in a field situation to generate ‘proof’ that one design action or another is likely to be a more effective design solution, in terms if adding value to the designed outcome. Value that is added is usually in terms of beneficial effects on users, but users are a large and diverse group (staff, visitors, cleaners, the public …) and not limited to health-care environments. I think the issue facing EBD – as I have written – is what constitutes ‘evidence’, as most data analysis and testing is based on the statistical probability of one or another outcome being the result of something other than chance. The designer, as the participant who transposes the ‘evidence’ into a concrete act, still has the job of interpreting the results.

Research-based design seems to me at this point to be a slightly vaguer term, in that ‘research’ can include just about any activity that the designer opts to engage in as part of their problem analysis. My students use ‘research’ to describe looking up design solutions in magazines, studying the designs of published architects, reading articles and books related to the topic and or to the design process, as well as going into the field and questioning (systematically or otherwise) stakeholders. In reference to your question, I do not use either EBD or RBD to indicate a ‘design process’ – that for me is another term with a whole other meaning, or set of meanings. I also do not consider that either term is limited to health care environments, although this is where EBD is gaining currency at the present time.

Are you saying that  EBD is fast and practical and that RBD isn't? If so, why?

No I do not think ‘fast’ and ‘practical’ characterize either EBD or RBD. I wrote that the temptation to do research ‘fast’ can lead to dangerous waters both in terms of validity, that is, what exactly we think we are measuring, as well as reliability – that is, the effectiveness of the testing or measuring we decide to use. For me the appeal of EBD is the logical and practical link into design decision-making, such that spaces designed for specific uses are based on what is known about user behaviour rather than on the designer’s speculation or limited personal experience. We used to think we could fix this problem with POE but we were not always effective. I think EBD is a better way of improving the situation but realistically it is not possible to perform research projects on every aspect of a design project. And anyway, why would one want to? Part of what the client is paying the designer for is his or her creativity, imagination and intuitive problem-solving skills.

What are the the "ethical implications" you are referring to when discussing the dark side of  EDB? Are you are saying that EBD is more prone to rush research which is inherently a time consuming process?

Yes in part. I am also saying that there is a risk that a designer not trained in research can set up a bogus project in the name of EBD and then claim scientific validity for his or her design decisions. Most clients are not researchers either so are not in a position to distinguish between a piece of solid research and one that has taken short-cuts and led to biased results. You know the old saying: “There are lies, damned lies, and statistics”. And we definitely live in a culture that values quantitative reasoning, regardless of what it is based on!

You mention the value of Post Occupancy Evaluation (POE). Can't Post Occupancy Evaluations be used in both EBD and RBD?

I would say that RBD, as an umbrella concept, can include POE as one way of doing research for design.

In my article I distinguish between POE and EBD, but I could well see how an EBD research project might be incorporated into a broad-based POE.

You did not mention the fact that EBD is in it's infancy and the actual amount of hard data to guide designers of hospitals is remarkably small. Isn't that a serious concern for EBD and RBD?

The data that guides doctors in their medical decisions is also often ‘remarkably small’. There is no objective standard of when we have enough data to make the ‘right’ decision. In that way, designers are no different from doctors. I stress the importance of the designer’s experience, intuition, sensitivity and principles  - as well as research results - in solving design problems. We do not want to find ourselves supporting a ‘scientific’ approach to design at the expense of all those other important factors; we may end up with a lot of bad designs!

Lastly where does the title of your article "The Methods of Our Madness" come from?

From the Editor, I’m afraid!

Jacqueline Visher, PhD is Professor of design, University of Montréal.

Continue reading "Evidence-based Design Under Attack (Part 2)" »

August 28, 2008

Evidence-based Design Under Attack

Methodsofourmadnessblog














Evidence-based Design criticized

World Health Design's premier issue (April 2008) has an article introduced by Dr. Jacqueline Vischer comparing Evidence-based Design (EBD) to Research-based Design. Since selecting art for healthcare is increasingly based on Evidence-based Design, I wanted to know more.

Dr. Vischer writes:

The dark side of EBD is that time and other practical limitations might have ethical implications, leading to a compromise of research protocol or erroneous methods of data collection and analysis.

... it is important, therefore, not to substitute it for conventional research

After reading the article I could not understand how Evidence-based Design differs from conventional research (also known as Research-based Design). Because I was unable to reach Dr. Vischer I asked an EBD researcher to comment:

Dr. Xiaobo Quan writes:

The discussion around EBD has revealed again that different people may have different definitions and opinions about the same term or concept. In my personal opinion, these are the same thing. EBD is research-based.

To read the full article click here. This will download a PDF of the April 2008 World Health Design. This article starts on page 16.

Jacqueline Visher, PhD is Professor of design, University of Montréal.

Xiaobo Quan, PhD is a researcher at the Center for Health Design

Search this blog