Challenging Art Project: Long Term Acute Care
One of the winners in the contest for the "most challenging art project" was the HealthCare Architect Jeffrey Yentz. This is the text that Jeffrey submitted:
There is a new healthcare paradigm and that is the hospital within a hospital concept which drives the aesthetic "bus" of an LTACH (long term acute care hospital). With an aging population that is sicker then a typical patient prescribed to be discharged; the federal government has agreed there should be a unique inpatient environment affording a length of stay approaching 26 days (versus the norm of 4).
The challenge is to create an environment that stimulates, inspires, and motivates. One such way is to accomplish said goal is by introducing artwork that with subtle inferences enhances said motivation.
The goal is to create a sense of self trust and self worth during the course of recuperation so that the patient is inclined to return home healthy versus attempting to cling to every "free" day within a hospital environment.
How is this accomplished?
We emphasized photographic images in lieu of framed poster art. Traditional art inherently elicits an emotional gleaning but does not reflect the reality of the world the healthcare clientele will be returning to. Plus, much of available artwork does not speak to the united nations sort of clientele that befalls the contemporary reality: different cultures, different races, different beliefs, ages, sexes, etc. Carefully selected photos however reflect both an honesty and personality that all can relate to especially if the images are from in and around the region. The result is a united nations imagery for a united nations clientele.
One interesting unanticipated turn of events was the treatment of photographic images. To frame or not to frame. In other words, to transpose the photographic image onto a canvas or to have that product hung versus the traditional framing. A juxtaposition is what transpired. Clientele leaning to the geriatric side of the patient population much preferred the framed scenario because it made them feel like there were looking through a window .. which invariably is what they do for the most part when they are at home. They simply do not opt to traverse outside all that much. This means their world is akin to looking through a looking glass. However clientele (not up in years) preferred a tactile aesthetic presentation (the canvas option) because their world is very much getting out in the world and the canvas scenario afforded more connectivity to their world's features and elements.
Since a hospital staff cannot predict the profile of patient about to be a denizen on an LTACH environment we could not "segregate" an aesthetic zone for the framed clientele versus the canvas clientele. So in the final resolve there was a "leap frog" approach that annotated every other corridor piece would be of type "one" and the next as type "two". This appeased each category of clientele BUT also represented a therapeutic motivator for the patient who needed to get up and about. So in lieu of the traditional motivational flooring "squares"/patterns we could keep the floor patterning clean and leave the motivation to the wall treatments.
Jeffrey Yentz AIA is the Corporate Architect for Centra Health/Virginia Baptist Hopital in Lynchburg Virginia. As an award, he has received a brand new copy of HealthCare Spaces 4





Recent Comments